For an organization with a mission to prevent alarmist garbage news, this doesn’t seem well aligned. And the guy writes like a thug, which is fine when you’re not trying to pass yourself off as a morally superior unbiased journalist. Below is my response, which I had to put on the Brian Williams fearmongering article since the other one doesn’t allow comments now:
_____
Clearly the fear industry is profitable. It’s really a shame that journalists try to scare their readers, and editorialize and let emotion rule their articles just to get clicks and shares. Like this prime example: https://www.acsh.org/…/backyard-chickens-are-fun-until-vomi…
Backyard chickens = vomit & diarrhea. Right.
Because, like you said:
‘As part of the “natural is better” movement, many Americans — particularly those who live in the city and know absolutely nothing about agriculture — have decided that playing farmer is a fun pastime. It certainly can be a fun hobby… that is, until the vomiting and diarrhea begin.’
We’re all playing at being farmers. We know nothing about agriculture. We should absolutely leave it to professionals, because large farm operations never have outbreaks of salmonella that get back to the general population through purchases of eggs, chicken, alfalfa sprouts, etc. We’re pretty dumb people who really love spraying waste from both ends because we have an idyllic view of chickens, right?
‘This entire story illustrates the fallacy of the “back to nature” or “farm-to-table” movement. Just because you know where your food comes from doesn’t mean it’s any healthier. As it turns out, there’s a really good reason why we have “processed food”: It makes the food safer for us to consume.’
Again, I’m sure you have context for this. Eggs produced by pastured hens aren’t any more nutritious, right? (http://news.psu.edu/…/research-shows-eggs-pastured-chickens…) Maybe you have data on the percentage of the total chicken keeping population these ‘ambitious urban cowboys’ account for- I mean, that would be the responsible thing to consider when writing an article talking about backyard chicken keepers like they’re all getting sick from their hens.
I almost forgot to mention: you’re harping on ‘farm to table’ and people wanting ‘natural’ food because it’s healthier. And that’s totally debatable in so many cases, I agree. But that’s NOT what drives most people to have a backyard flock. There’s a human element there that makes us care about animal welfare, which is something that’s pretty appallingly done in a factory farm setting. I do it because I want kids in the area to know what chickens are, and how they produce eggs (nevermind the adults who don’t know how they produce eggs). And I do it to improve soil health and water retention in my backyard. Is all of that just as easy to mock?
I don’t know why you even talked about eggs in the article honestly. The CDC numbers you reported are from LIVE POULTRY interaction, and I quote:
‘The CDC reports that 10 separate Salmonella outbreaks, affecting 48 states and DC, has sickened 790 people and hospitalized at least 174. The outbreaks have been linked to hatcheries where people handled ducklings and chicks.’
You’re not wrong when you say a hen could be “plopping out little time bombs”. You’re not wrong, but you’re being alarmist. And if you weren’t headlining an organization dedicated to sound journalism and science, I’d be a lot more understanding. I’d be even more understanding if you said that in the context of a CDC report concerning salmonella from backyard chicken EGGS, rather than tossing it into your article like the eggs are part of the CDC outbreak report.
And one more quote from you I’d like to address: “And be on the lookout for predators. If you live in the wrong part of town, a hawk just might swoop in for a snack. Your precious little chickens might last a morning, but by afternoon, the survivors would be asking not to be free-range anymore.”
This non sequitur really shows you’re out of your element Alex. The chickens would TOTALLY be asking to free-range again. They’re not that smart, and they really like to roam.
Here’s a screenshot of the article in case it ever disappears:
It’s that time of year again: the yearly outbreak report on human Salmonella cases linked to live poultry. Get ready to clutch your pearls and hide your kids!
Since the last update on June 1, 2017, 418 more ill people have been reported. The most recent illness began on June 20, 2017.
CDC, multiple states, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (USDA-APHIS) are investigating 10 separate multistate outbreaks of Salmonella infections in people who had contact with live poultry in backyard flocks.
These outbreaks are caused by several DNA fingerprints of different Salmonella bacteria: Salmonella Braenderup, Salmonella Enteritidis, Salmonella Hadar, Salmonella I 4,[5],12:i-, Salmonella Indiana, Salmonella Infantis, Salmonella Litchfield, Salmonella Mbandaka, Salmonella Muenchen, Salmonella Typhimurium.
The outbreak strains of Salmonella have infected a reported 790 people in 48 states and the District of Columbia.
Illnesses started on dates ranging from January 4, 2017 to June 20, 2017.
Of 580 people with available information, 174 ill people have been hospitalized. No deaths have been reported.
Epidemiologic, traceback, and laboratory findings link the 10 outbreaks to contact with live poultry, such as chicks and ducklings, from multiple hatcheries.
In interviews, 409 (74%) of 553 ill people reported contact with live poultry in the week before illness started.
Sounds pretty scary, right? 10 outbreaks?! 790 cases? No wonder news outlets hurried to write cutting-edge stories like:
So what does this all mean? Just how much damage are these backyard chickens doing? Why is everyone kissing chickens? What’s WRONG with these chicken people??
When two or more people get the same illness from the same contaminated food or drink, the event is called a foodborne disease outbreak. Similarly, when two or more people get the same illness from contact with the same animal or animal environment, the event is called a zoonotic outbreak.
Simple definition of an ‘outbreak’: any time 2+ people get sick with the same illness anywhere in the US. I should’ve been going into my last corporate job in a biohazard suit every day, ‘cuz it was basically an ongoing outbreak of whatever sickness people picked up from their kids/spouse/etc.
So, what does the “10 outbreaks’ refer to at the CDC? 10 different strains of Salmonella. Two or more people got infected per strain, making it an outbreak.
The Backyard Chicken Salmonella Outbreak Numbers, Put Into Context
The CDC website is not fun to navigate, nor are their tables of data easy to just pull and analyze. Some of the tables don’t even have the states in alphabetical order. Still, it was worth it to satisfy my curiosity and pull the data all into one table. I only pulled data up through 2013, because 2012 was the first year they seem to have Salmonella linked to live poultry and they broke down the reporting into each Salmonella strain, which would have taken me a little too long to merge into this table. Embedded table is scroll-able, or use the link below it to navigate to the Google Sheet showing the full table.
When the numbers stand on their own, it’s easy to get nervous. For instance, I live in Michigan, and was shocked to see 55 cases of Salmonella attributed to interaction with live poultry in 2016. But what percentage of the population is that? How much of an issue are we facing?
Of course, nobody knows how many people keep backyard chickens (even in cities with backyard chicken municipal code & licensing, there are people who keep them without reporting them). So, for giggles, I did some lazy guesswork, just to see what sort of percentages we might be looking at.
Percentage of Chicken Keeping Population in Michigan Who Became Sick With Salmonella in 2017
Let’s make some assumptions:
1.) Let’s assume that all those reported sick from live poultry are actually poultry keepers, not just people who touched or were otherwise around chickens in the 2 weeks prior to getting sick.
4695 members in the Facebook group “Chickens For Sale in Michigan”
2.) Let’s assume that the number of people who keep chickens in Michigan corresponds to the number of members in the Chickens for Sale in Michigan Facebook group, which has 4695 members today.
2017 MI Salmonella Cases
# Chicken Keepers in MI
18
4695
18 is what % of 4,695? .38%
Of course, these are pretty big assumptions, and they’re assuming on the low side. The CDC likes to point out that many people who become infected with Salmonella will never report it, because they might just get a stomach ache & diarrhea and then get over it. Likewise, I think there are far more than 4695 people in Michigan keeping chickens; as support of my theory, I look at forums like BackyardChickens.com and their Michigan Backyard Chicken Keepers thread, which is currently 3964 pages long with a total of 39,635 messages.
Regardless, maybe this 4695 is a big part of our Michigan population, and we need to be worried about those 4695 people getting sick, crippling our economy and overrunning hospitals. How big of a threat potential is there?? Let’s look at 2016 numbers, since I can pull Michigan census data for 2016.
2016 MI Cases
# Chicken Keepers in MI
2016 Pop. of MI
55
4695
9,928,300
4,695 is what % of 9,928,300? .047%
In 2016, our % of sick is actually much higher than where we are right now in 2017. However, chicken keepers, as a whole, are a TINY percentage of the overall population of Michigan, and then only a TINY percentage of them have contracted Salmonella (again, making big assumptions in all cases).
How Are People Getting Sick With Salmonella From Backyard Chickens?
It’s a good question, since it’s so easy to NOT get sick if you practice basic hygiene and use common sense. Basically, the rule is:
Don’t put stuff in your mouth that could be unclean.
It’s a pretty easy concept. Your mom likely drilled it into your head when you were a kid. “Wash your hands” she’d say. “Don’t stick that in your mouth!” She’d scream. Things like that.
Basically, with chickens, you have to assume they’ve gotten in or around poo. I assume the same thing with my dog and cat, honestly, and they get the privilege of sleeping on furniture. If you wash your hands before sticking them in your mouth, and if you don’t go around licking surfaces in your house/yard, you should be fine.
So how are people getting Salmonella from backyard chickens? I have some theories. Welcome to my…
Official Guide to Getting Salmonella from Backyard Chickens
Lick everything. Always.
Clean the coop with your spoon, while you’re eating breakfast.
Let your chicken nest in your salad bowl.
Share toothbrushes with your chickens, even though they don’t have teeth.
Suck eggs fresh from the chicken.
Let your chickens soak their feet in your tea after a long day of pecking and scratchin’.
Touch chickens then lick your hands.
Drink chicken-stomped wine.
Tongue bathe your chickens.
Keep your chickens toenails short by chewing them.
Important note on ‘Kissing Chickens Causes Salmonella’
All of the above are ludicrous examples, just like insinuating that backyard chicken keepers are all getting sick from getting too ‘intimate’ with their flock, kissing and snuggling them. There are currently 568,000 results for the search “kissing chickens” on Google- all because some remarks from the CDC on ‘kissing, hugging, and snuggling chickens’ blew up into “OMG THESE CHICKEN WEIRDOS ARE BASICALLY MAKING OUT WITH THEIR BIRDS” because that sort of headline gets clicks. It’s dumb, and it paints backyard chickens & their keepers as unsavory, odd people- certainly not the sort of people you want living in YOUR town.
As an example of why this is such a disingenuous tagline for all the stories, here’s a snippet from the 2015 Outbreak Summary:
Twenty-eight (41%) of 69 ill people with complete questionnaires reported keeping baby poultry indoors, 39 (57%) of 69 reported holding or snuggling baby poultry, and 4 (6%) of 69 reported kissing baby poultry. These behaviors increase a person’s risk of a Salmonella infection.
Yes, you read that right: 4 people reported kissing baby poultry in 2015. That was enough to generate high profile articles en masse published in 2015 on Google. Ridiculous headlines get shared, and journalism suffers because of it. Articles like “Salmonella Is Raging Because People Keep Kissing Chickens“. The article leaves out the context of how many people are kissing their chickens, and instead focuses on it like it’s the main issue- and it’s not. The issue is simple hygienic practices, like washing hands, removing shoes when coming into the house, and not putting your mouth on things that have touched poo (I know, I sound like a broken record). Oh, and teaching your KIDS to do that too.
How The CDC Reports Cases of Salmonella Makes It Easy For Naysayers to Fight Against the Legalization of Backyard Chickens
Here’s the crux of why I’m irritated by these yearly reports, and why I think it’s important to change the narrative on salmonella and backyard chickens: as more people strive to work with their city to create ordinances to allow backyard chickens, the alarmist nature of these articles is easy fodder for those who staunchly want to deny backyard chickens in their city. The way the data is being presented, not just by the CDC but also news organizations, is irresponsible and fearmongering.
During the city council sessions in Berkley MI, several people cited concerns over disease and salmonella running wild if backyard chickens were allowed. Luckily rational thought triumphed, but the city is still doing a limited scope ‘pilot program’, just in case- despite the blatant non-issue backyard chickens have been in Ferndale, Royal Oak, Hazel Park, Madison Heights, & Lathrup Village (all surrounding communities).
Every year, I wait for the numbers from the CDC to come out around early June. Every year, I get emails and notes to the Ferndale Backyard Chickens Facebook page, asking about the validity of the articles. And every year I say the same thing: no, I’m not worried about Salmonella. Don’t put poo in your mouth, wash your hands.
When I approached Ferndale back in 2008, the CDC wasn’t pushing press releases out about Salmonella and backyard chickens. I guess the argument can be made that it wasn’t as much of an issue, since fewer people had or were interested in urban chicken keeping. The tides of public opinion have shifted a good deal, but not so much that I’d say your average city dweller thinks backyard chickens are acceptable- and with fearmongering, click-baity articles coming out every year like clockwork, I wonder how public opinion will shift back toward disallowing urban chicken keeping. That’s why I think it’s so crucial to keep this in perspective: only a fraction of a percent of people are getting sick every year, and that shouldn’t be used as ammunition to keep people from being allowed to have chickens.
We, as chicken keepers, NEED to make sure the narrative isn’t one-sided. Share this article with family and friends any time they tag you on another ‘kissing chickens’ outbreak article. Make sure they know that Salmonella isn’t transferred via air, and that basic hygiene keeps people safe. Most of all, let them know they’re safe- this isn’t something your average chicken keeper has to fear, and it isn’t something non chicken keepers need to be concerned about.
Ferndale Chickens 